New launch condos in 2026 are costing buyers less of a premium over resale than at any point since 2023. The average price gap between a new launch and its nearest resale comparable has narrowed from 19.1% in 2023 to 6.8% today, a compression of nearly two-thirds in three years. For anyone deciding between a new launch and a resale condo this year, that shift changes the calculus more than any single project review can.
It matters because new launch, TOP condo, and resale don’t move on the same clock. A new launch sets the price benchmark for its precinct, developers price it to clear the block quickly, and the surrounding resale stock spends the next few years catching up to that new benchmark. How wide the gap still is, at any given moment, tells you how much of that catch-up has already happened, and whether buying resale today still gets you in ahead of the curve or whether that trade has already played out.
We are Decoupling Expertise
We are a real estate investment consultancy that specialises in helping investors procure a 2nd investment property.
Our expertise is grounded on 2 fronts:
- Tax Optimisation — Finding the most tax optimised strategy for investment minded property owners to procure a second property
- Research — Analyst by trait, operator of our own dual property portfolio by experience. We pride ourselves on conducting profit-focused, practical research to help our clients and readers shortlist investment property and validate purchase decisions.
You are now reading a sample of our research work. Feel free to drop us a text if you would like to seek a 2nd opinion on your investment decision.
Scope of This Article
By the end of this article, you’ll know:
- The price gap for each of 2026’s seven benchmarkable launches, not flattened into one cohort average.
- Whether that gap has been widening or narrowing since 2023, and what’s actually driving the direction.
- Why an unadjusted psf comparison overstates resale’s discount, and what the real gap looks like once lease and GFA harmonisation are normalised for.
- Whether 2026’s interest rate environment still tilts the decision toward new launch the way it has in past cycles.
How Price Gaps Between New Launch and Resale Reveal Where the Market Cycle Sits
Every new launch is priced to sell out fast. Developers set launch day prices low enough to clear the majority of units within the first weekend, then raise prices on the remaining stock as the project sells down. Buyers who miss the launch, or won’t stretch to the launch-day price, don’t disappear. Some wait for TOP and buy subsale, some buy resale in the surrounding precinct instead, and both of those markets reprice upward over the following years to close the distance on the new benchmark the launch just set.
That’s what the price gap between a new launch and its nearest resale comparable actually measures: not a fixed discount, but how much of that catch-up has already happened. A wide gap means the resale side hasn’t caught up yet, which is exactly the setup that has historically rewarded buyers willing to buy resale early and ride the catch-up. A narrow, or negative, gap means the resale side has already closed most or all of the distance, and the timing edge that comes from buying resale cheap and waiting has already been captured by someone else.
To measure this for 2026, we identified the youngest resale development near each launch that could reasonably serve as its comparable, took the raw psf gap between the two, then corrected it for lease and normalised it for GFA harmonisation, so a fresh 99-year launch isn’t compared unfairly against an older resale unit measured under a different standard. Both corrections are unpacked properly further down this article.
The 2026 Price Gap, Project by Project
Seven 2026 launches currently have a resale comparable solid enough to run this against:
- Narra Residences — Dairy Farm Walk, Hillview (OCR) — launched 31 January 2026
- River Modern — River Valley Green (CCR) — launched 7 March 2026
- Pinery Residences — Tampines St 94 (OCR) — launched 28 March 2026
- Vela Bay — Bayshore Road (OCR) — launched 25 April 2026
- Hudson Place Residences — Media Circle, One-North (RCR) — launched 16 May 2026
- Lentor Gardens Residences — Lentor Gardens (OCR) — launched 18 July 2026
- Dunearn House — Dunearn Road, Turf City (CCR) — launched 25 July 2026
| New Launch | Launch PSF | Resale Comparable | Resale PSF | Adjusted Price Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| River Modern | $3,401 | The Avenir | $3,244 | –0.2% |
| Lentor Gardens Residences | $2,345 | Lentor Modern | $2,313 | –3.6% |
| Hudson Place Residences | $2,588 | One-North Eden | $2,391 | 2.0% |
| Vela Bay | $2,869 | Seaside Residences | $2,364 | 3.3% |
| Narra Residences | $2,168 | Dairy Farm Residences | $1,810 | 10.5% |
| Dunearn House | $3,038 | Fourth Avenue Residences | $2,450 | 12.7% |
| Pinery Residences | $2,615 | Treasure at Tampines | $1,865 | 22.8% |
River Modern and Lentor Gardens Residences sit at the tight end, at –0.2% and –3.6%. A gap at or below zero means the resale side has already closed the distance, and in Lentor Gardens Residences‘ case overtaken it, so waiting for resale to become the cheaper option in either precinct no longer makes sense. It already is, or close enough that the difference isn’t worth optimising for.
Hudson Place Residences, Vela Bay, Narra Residences, and Dunearn House occupy the middle of the range, at 2.0%, 3.3%, 10.5%, and 12.7%. Hudson Place and Vela Bay sit closest to the tight end, which reads as a resale side that has largely, but not fully, caught up. Narra Residences and Dunearn House sit further out, closer to what a mid-cycle premium has typically looked like across this dataset.
Pinery Residences is priced at a wider premium, 22.8% over Treasure at Tampines, because it’s an integrated development, while Treasure at Tampines sits further from the MRT and isn’t integrated with a mall or the station the way Pinery is.
That distortion shows up directly in the numbers. Across the seven pairs, the average corrected price gap is 6.8%, and the median is 3.3%. Pinery’s integrated-development premium is what’s pulling the average away from the median, not a genuinely wider catch-up gap across the cohort, so the median is the better read on what a typical 2026 launch actually costs you over resale.

Has the Gap Been Widening or Narrowing Since 2023?
A 6.8% cohort average only means something set against what came before it. To compare fairly across years, each launch’s price gap is measured at its own launch window, its first few transacted months, against its resale comparable’s price in that same window, rather than comparing today’s prices for both, which would blend in years of appreciation that happened after the fact and tell you nothing about the entry premium a buyer actually paid.
2023 carried the widest premiums in this dataset:
| Launch | Launch Date | Launch PSF | Resale Comparable | Resale PSF | Lease-Adjusted Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tembusu Grand | April 2023 | $2,474 | Waterbank At Dakota | $1,837 | 17.4% |
| Grand Dunman | July 2023 | $2,536 | Waterbank At Dakota | $1,891 | 17.1% |
| Lentor Hills Residences | July 2023 | $2,103 | The Calrose | $1,659 | 21.1% |
| The Reserve Residences | May 2023 | $2,494 | Dover Parkview | $1,410 | 23.3% |
| J’den | November 2023 | $2,476 | J Gateway | $1,919 | 16.6% |
The average across these five pairs is 19.1%, and Tembusu Grand and Grand Dunman, launched three months apart and both benchmarked against the same comparable, Waterbank At Dakota, land within half a percentage point of each other, a useful cross-check that the method holds up even applied independently to two launches sharing one comparable.
2024 barely moved off that:
| Launch | Launch Date | Launch PSF | Resale Comparable | Resale PSF | Corrected Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerald of Katong | November 2024 | $2,640 | Katong Regency | $1,836 | 27.0% |
| Chuan Park | November 2024 | $2,588 | The Scala | $1,944 | 15.5% |
| Lentor Mansion | March 2024 | $2,276 | The Calrose | $1,854 | 14.5% |
| Nava Grove | November 2024 | $2,456 | Dover Parkview | $1,432 | 15.8% |
The average is 18.2%. That stretch was still the post-pandemic construction-cost run-up: new launch prices kept climbing to cover higher build costs, and resale simply hadn’t caught its breath yet. Emerald of Katong’s 27.0% gap, the widest single reading anywhere in this four-year dataset, is what keeps the 2024 average from showing the narrowing that the rest of the cohort was already starting to signal.
2025 is where the pattern broke:
| Launch | Launch Date | Launch PSF | Resale Comparable | Resale PSF | Corrected Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faber Residence | October 2025 | $2,154 | Clementi Park | $1,810 | 11.7% |
| Penrith | October 2025 | $2,794 | Stirling Residences | $2,371 | 8.1% |
| Zyon Grand | October 2025 | $3,045 | Martin Modern | $2,790 | –0.3% |
| River Green | August 2025 | $3,127 | RV Altitude | $2,880 | 3.3% |
| Canberra Crescent Residences | August 2025 | $1,986 | Canberra Residences | $1,111 | 34.7% |
This is where launch prices ran into buyer resistance: developers who kept pushing new benchmarks higher found fewer buyers willing to stretch for them, which slowed new-launch price growth just as resale kept climbing on its own momentum, and the gap closed hard in one year. Zyon Grand, at –0.3% against Martin Modern, is the first launch in this dataset to price at effective parity with its comparable rather than above it. Canberra Crescent Residences, at the opposite end, posts the widest reading in the entire four-year set at 34.7%, but its comparable is considerably older and further from its precinct profile than the other four pairings here, so it’s excluded as a genuine outlier rather than treated as part of the trend. That leaves the straight average at 11.5% and the outlier-excluded average at 5.7%, which sits far closer to where the rest of the 2025 cohort actually landed.
| Year | Average Corrected Price Gap | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 19.1% | — |
| 2024 | 18.2% | Slight narrowing |
| 2025 | 11.5% (5.7% excluding outlier) | Sharp narrowing |
| 2026 | 6.8% | Narrowing vs. 2025 headline; flat vs. 2025 ex-outlier |
At 6.8%, 2026 sits well below 2025’s unadjusted 11.5%, but fractionally above the outlier-excluded 5.7%. Four years in, the resale side closed most of its distance on new launch in that one sharp year, 2025, rather than gradually across four, and 2026 has held roughly where that correction left it rather than closing further. Zyon Grand against Martin Modern in 2025, and now River Modern and Lentor Gardens Residences in 2026, priced at or below their resale comparable outright, something that didn’t happen once in the 2023 cohort. For anyone timing a resale purchase specifically to buy before new launch pulls away again, the window to do that is smaller than it was three years ago, and in a growing number of precincts, has already closed.

Why Often Resale Condos Look Significantly Cheaper in Both PSF and Purchase Quantum Compared to New Launches
This could be misleading if not adjusted for two factors:
- The difference in lease life. A resale comparable sitting on a meaningfully shorter lease than its new-launch counterpart deserves a discount on that basis alone, separate from the catch-up gap this article is measuring. We normalise both sides onto the same lease basis before comparing psf.
- GFA harmonisation. Older resale projects often have non-livable area, bay windows, planter boxes, air-con ledges, counted into their quoted square footage, making it look like you’re paying less to buy a bigger unit than you actually are, while a new launch priced after harmonisation is charging psf strictly for livable space.
The Adjusted Price Gap shown earlier already normalises for both, which is why it, not a raw psf comparison, is the figure this article treats as real.
Drop us a text if you would like to seek a 2nd opinion on your investment decision.
Does 2026’s Interest Rate Environment Still Favour New Launch?
The price-gap findings above should carry the primary weight in this decision. Interest rates are worth checking as a secondary factor, mainly because the case for new launch on financing grounds has traditionally leaned on one specific mechanic, and it’s worth being clear-eyed about how much that mechanic is actually contributing in 2026’s rate environment.
Representative mortgage rates in 2026 sit at approximately 1.6%, well below the roughly 3.0% seen at the 2022/2023 peak, and further still from the 4.5% level banks stress-test borrowers against. Under the Progressive Payment Scheme, a new-launch buyer’s loan is disbursed in tranches as construction milestones are certified, and interest accrues only on the amount disbursed so far, not the full loan quantum, for most of the construction period. Against a resale purchase, where the full mortgage is serviced from day one, this has historically produced a real interest saving, and that saving scales directly with the prevailing rate:
| Rate Environment | Representative Rate | Estimated PPS Interest Saving |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 (current) | ~1.6% | $28,000–$38,000 |
| 2022/2023 peak | ~3.0% | $53,000–$70,000 |
| Stress-test ceiling | ~4.5% | $80,000–$106,000 |
At 2026’s rate, the saving sits closer to the bottom of this table than the top, roughly half of what it was at the 2022/2023 peak. That’s arithmetic rather than a shift in how PPS works: when the prevailing rate is already low, there is simply less interest on the table to defer in the first place.
The three rows in that table are also worth reading as a range of what could still happen over a multi-year construction period, not just a single current data point. A resale buyer transacting today locks a rate close to the 1.6% end of that range on their full loan immediately. A new-launch buyer’s later PPS disbursements, spread over the following construction years, will be priced at whatever the prevailing rate is at each milestone, which could sit anywhere across this same range by the time those tranches are drawn. If rates were to drift back toward the stress-test ceiling over that window, a portion of the PPS saving shown above would be given back in the form of a higher rate on the later tranches, a rate-path risk a resale buyer locking in today simply doesn’t carry. That doesn’t reverse the case for new launch, but it does mean the price-gap findings, not the financing structure, should carry the greater weight in a 2026 decision.
So, Which Is Better for Investment in 2026?
2026 is a good year to be looking seriously at new launch. With the cohort average down to 6.8%, and River Modern and Lentor Gardens Residences already priced at or below their resale comparable, a 2026 buyer can pick up a new launch at the same psf as the resale unit next door, sometimes cheaper, while still getting a fresh lease and the developer’s built-in launch-day pricing on the way up. That’s an advantageous entry price that simply wasn’t on offer in 2023, and it’s reason enough to give this year’s new launches real consideration rather than defaulting to resale out of habit.
The catch is that this only holds project by project, not across the board. Pinery Residences still carries a premium more than three times the cohort average, so the narrow-gap story doesn’t apply everywhere. Before committing to any specific launch, check its price gap against its own closest resale comparable, not the cohort average. If that gap is flat or negative, the way it is for River Modern and Lentor Gardens Residences, that’s your green light. If it’s still wide, treat that launch with the same caution you would have in 2023.
New Launch or Resale as Your Second Property After Decoupling?
Everything above answers the price-gap question for a 2026 buyer generally. For a reader weighing this specifically as the second property funded by a decoupling transaction, new launch is usually the favoured pick, for three reasons:
- Higher upside over a shorter holding period. Historically, a new launch’s capital gain, realised mostly between booking and TOP, has outpaced what a comparable resale purchase delivers over the same few years.
- Progressive Payment Scheme interest savings. The saving has shrunk in 2026’s low-rate environment, down to $28,000–$38,000 from $53,000–$70,000 at the 2022/2023 peak, but spread across the roughly 3-year construction period, it’s still a real saving worth factoring in.
- A narrower entry price sets up a bigger capital gain. At 6.8% in 2026 versus 19.1% in 2023, you’re paying less of a premium to get in, which leaves more room for the price to run before you’re simply catching up to where resale already sits.
Drop us a text if you would like to seek a 2nd opinion on your investment decision.