Introduction
It has been 4 years since we started running this boutique consultancy serving as the research aide to investment minded property owners.
One recurring theme that often surfaces in our engagements is the desire to identify new launch projects that can deliver the greatest capital return in the shortest amount of time.
While it sounds like a tall order, over time we realise there is a pattern to this – and this forms the context for this article. The goal is to highlight the common attributes amongst new launch developments that have historically generated the most return in the shortest period of time.
A Focus on 2nd Level Analysis Over Cliché
A challenge we set for ourselves in this research article is to focus on 2nd level thinking and to avoid cliché.
We believe the thinking in meta is where the alpha lies. Observing the nuances behind common patterns provides insights that we can capitalise on for profit making.
The Research that Forms the Backbone of this Article
This article is written based on insights generated from a research conducted with the methodology described below.
As a pretext, the emphasis of the research is on gaining directional insight – and less on being statistically significant or empirically accurate.
- A list of 32 new launch developments that were completed 5 to 7 years from the time of writing was studied.
- The key metrics reviewed were median profit, median annual capital appreciation, and median holding duration.
- We then applied a survivorship bias study, filtering out developments that surpassed a profit threshold of $400k for a 3 bedroom unit and $250k for a 2 bedroom unit.
- An element of time and holding duration was then applied, sorting the winners and losers by holding duration in years.
In the sections that follow, we will share relevant insights that we have identified.
New Launch Fastest to Capital Gain Study

Reasonable Holding Duration for a New Launch Condo to Hit Optimal Capital Gain
First, to address a point on holding duration.
The common expectation – or misconception – is that a new launch condo can generate profit as soon as it TOPs. While this is true, we identified the 5-year mark as the reasonable time frame to benchmark in order for your new launch investment to reach its maximal profit potential.
Based on Our Study for 3 Bedroom Units
- Top performers – average 5.1 years to pass $400k profit
- Mid performers – average 5.9 years to pass $400k profit
- Bottom performers – excluded as they did not pass the $400k threshold
Based on Our Study for 2 Bedroom Units
- Top performers – average 5.2 years to pass $250k profit
- Mid performers – average 5.8 years to pass $250k profit
- Bottom performers – excluded as they did not pass the $250k threshold
Special Case – Slightly Prolonged Holding Duration for CCR Properties
A point to note is that a slightly more prolonged holding duration of 6 to 7 years should be used as a benchmark for CCR properties.
This is due to the fact that the CCR property landscape is currently undergoing a transformation, transitioning from the previous foreign buyer-dominant landscape into one driven by local Singapore homestay buyers.
Having said that, we remain positive that CCR residential locations like River Valley, Harbour Front, Novena, and Newton will eventually transition into areas of high growth.
Separate research article on CCR to follow: Can CCR Condos Be Profitable Again? – Why Investors Are Quietly Buying In
Now that we have established common expectations on holding duration, let’s dive deeper into the common attributes.
We Are Decoupling Expertise
We are a real estate investment consultancy that specialises in helping investors procure a 2nd investment property.
Our expertise is grounded on 2 fronts:
- Tax Optimisation – Finding the most tax optimised strategy for investment minded property owners to procure a second property
- Research – Analyst by trait, operator of our own dual property portfolio by experience. We pride ourselves on conducting profit-focused, practical research to help our clients and readers shortlist investment property and validate purchase decisions.
You are now reading a sample of our research work.
Feel free to drop us a text if you would like to seek a 2nd opinion on your investment decision.
Common Attribute #1 – RCR Projects Tend to Provide the Greatest Capital Gain in the Shortest Period of Time
The most prominent attribute observed across all top performing new launch projects that attain the highest capital gain in the shortest period of time is that they are mostly located within the RCR region.
While this seems obvious, there are nuances we can extract and learn from this. RCR projects tend to be more successful than those in other regions due to a confluence of factors.
RCR Projects Dominate the List for Greatest Capital Gain in Shortest Time
| Rank | Development | Tier | Median Profit (S$) | Median Yrs to S$400k | District Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stirling Residences | Top | S$554,000 | 4.9 | RCR |
| 2 | Parc Esta | Top | S$594,000 | 4.5 | RCR |
| 3 | Martin Modern | Top | S$651,920 | 6.5 | CCR |
| 4 | Whistler Grand | Top | S$551,540 | 5.1 | OCR |
| 5 | Daintree Residence | Top | S$460,000 | 4.6 | OCR |
| 6 | Artra | Top | S$604,950 | 5.7 | RCR |
| 7 | Jadescape | Top | S$538,700 | 4.5 | RCR |
| 8 | Park Colonial | Mid | S$507,000 | 5.7 | RCR |
| 9 | The Tre Ver | Mid | S$435,500 | 4.7 | RCR |
| 10 | Seaside Residences | Mid | S$516,000 | 6.1 | RCR |
| 11 | Margaret Ville | Mid | S$409,308 | 6.1 | RCR |
| 12 | Forest Woods | Mid | S$406,000 | 7.4 | OCR |
1. Weakness Amongst Competition and Supply Scarcity
RCR locations have a longer lineage in terms of real estate development. This creates a landscape whereby there is a saturation of older condo developments and a greater scarcity for newer, modern launches – newer in aesthetics, positioned for affordable quantum through smaller floor plates, and built with efficiency in mind.
This creates a much more advantageous competitive environment for new launch projects like Parc Esta, competing against a slew of ageing boutique developments in Eunos – as compared to Garden Residences in the OCR, which had to compete against the equally new and affordable Hundred Palm Residences in Upper Serangoon.
2. Balanced Between Centrality and Affordability
A common behavioural pattern observed amongst HDB upgraders – or families that have profited significantly from the sale of their BTO in the suburbs – is that there tends to be an aspiration to move towards a more centralised location, rather than upgrading to a private condo in the same area.
Given that these HDB or BTO upgraders are capped within a certain affordability threshold, they need to balance centrality in location with affordability.
From this perspective:
- CCR properties trump in terms of centrality but tend to fall outside the affordability threshold for these HDB upgraders.
- RCR properties in city fringe areas like Queenstown, Redhill, Toa Payoh, and Bishan still fall within the affordability threshold while fulfilling the aspirational needs tied to the location.
3. Parent and Childhood Familiarity Effect
Not substantiated by data, but derived from experience working with readers looking to exit from one BTO to two private properties.
Another common behavioural pattern observed is the desire to upgrade and relocate back to one’s childhood home location – which can also be where their parents currently live.
The obvious but overlooked norm is that many young couples got their BTO flat location not necessarily by choice, but simply as a factor of what was available at the point of balloting. Hence, there is often an intrinsic desire to liquidate that profitable BTO and relocate back to the estate in which they grew up.
Simply by the lineage of RCR districts and the skewed distribution of reputable primary schools in RCR areas, many BTO upgraders show a desire to relocate back to RCR locations like Bishan, Marymount, and Eunos.
Common Attribute #2 – Lack of Competition from EC
ECs are formidable competitors to a new launch condo.
Consider this: new launch condos often set the benchmark price for a location by occupying the most prime position in the neighbourhood. ECs are like feeders – located a couple of streets away but launched at a government-subsidised price that is 20% to 30% lower than a new launch. Upon the 5-year MOP of these ECs, owners resell their units at a lower resale price while still profiting significantly.
Hence, a significant portion of our research work has been spent on evaluating new launch opportunities against EC competition – for new launch developments like Pinery Residences and Tengah Garden Residences.
Back to the topic: from the list of top to mid performing new launch developments, a common characteristic observed is the absence of EC launches in the area.
Absence of Executive Condo (EC) as Competition Amongst Top Performing New Launch
| Rank | Development | Tier | Median Profit (S$) | Median Yrs to S$400k | Presence of EC in the Area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stirling Residences | Top | S$554,000 | 4.9 | No |
| 2 | Parc Esta | Top | S$594,000 | 4.5 | No |
| 3 | Martin Modern | Top | S$651,920 | 6.5 | No |
| 4 | Whistler Grand | Top | S$551,540 | 5.1 | No |
| 5 | Daintree Residence | Top | S$460,000 | 4.6 | No |
| 6 | Artra | Top | S$604,950 | 5.7 | No |
| 7 | Jadescape | Top | S$538,700 | 4.5 | No |
| 8 | Park Colonial | Mid | S$507,000 | 5.7 | No |
| 9 | The Tre Ver | Mid | S$435,500 | 4.7 | No |
| 10 | Seaside Residences | Mid | S$516,000 | 6.1 | No |
| 11 | Margaret Ville | Mid | S$409,308 | 6.1 | No |
| 12 | Forest Woods | Mid | S$406,000 | 7.4 | No |
Common Attribute #3 – Large Developments Win; Small Developments Are a Recipe for Failure
This is not a new insight – it must have been highlighted on many occasions. The common reason cited for favouring large developments over small boutique developments is often transactional volume. But we want to highlight several nuances that are understated in the large versus small development debate.
[3 Bedroom Underperformers – Dominated by Developments with Small Unit Counts]
| Rank | Development | Tier | Median Profit (S$) | Median Year Held | Unit Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Mayfair Modern | Bottom | S$339,200 | 4.2 | 171 |
| 24 | The Antares | Bottom | S$284,000 | 3.4 | 265 |
| 25 | The Gazania | Bottom | S$266,000 | 3.6 | 250 |
| 26 | Verandah Residences | Bottom | S$255,000 | 6.3 | 170 |
| 27 | Jui Residences | Bottom | S$229,514 | 4.5 | 117 |
| 28 | The Jovell | Bottom | S$218,950 | 3.9 | 428 |
| 29 | Kandis Residence | Bottom | S$153,100 | 5.6 | 130 |
1. Small Boutique Developments Fail to Appeal to the Aspirational Condo Upgrading Needs of HDB Upgraders
Recall those moments when you are visiting a friend’s condo. What are the emotional catalysts that trigger that tingling emotion – the desire to fancy a certain condo development?
It is often the well-spaced, generous-looking drive-in lobby, the mega-sized pool with water slides, the air-conditioned lobby with a resort-like scent, and the pristine blue tennis court that trigger that emotional desire.
Now consider the flip side: small-scale condos are often built on a narrow plot of land with a small pool, no tennis court, and a small function room. While quaint and functional, small developments lack the emotional triggers that drive HDB upgrader demand.
2. Buyers’ Psychology Is Aligned Towards Profit Maximisation in a Large-Scale Development
If you speak to enough buyers looking to purchase a conventional mid-to-large sized new launch development, you will notice that they are often aligned on one thing – they are in this to generate profits.
On the contrary, if you were to observe the demographics of buyers purchasing boutique developments, you would notice that the intent and objective is significantly different. They tend to prioritise:
- Serenity of the location
- Privacy of the location
- Uniqueness of the layout
- The vibes that come with the neighbourhood
When owners’ psychology is aligned towards profit maximisation, most buyers in a new launch development will be pushing towards a profitable exit – with earlier sellers forming an internal benchmark for the next batch of sellers to build upon. In a boutique development, this momentum is mostly absent.
3. Large Developments Have a Greater Share of Mind Amongst Buyer Agents
Stewarding an investment property to profits is somewhat like running a business. To ensure the product you are selling – in this case, a new launch development – is top of mind amongst future buyers, we must understand the buying process.
A significant proportion of resale condo buyers purchase a property with the assistance of a buyer agent. Most of the time, agents shortlist or recommend properties to clients based on heuristics – i.e. whichever condo development comes to mind first for a location. These recommended condos are often the “big brother” large-scale developments in a particular location. Smaller developments are unfortunately often shortlisted only as an afterthought.
We wrote more about the big brother condo effect in the article: How to Choose the Best New Launch Condo in 2026?
Need Clarity Before Committing to a New Launch Condo?
Get independent, data-backed insights through our New Launch Condo Research Q&A:
- A tailored shortlist of new launch condos that match your search criteria
- Side-by-side pros and cons analysis of 2–3 projects you’re currently considering
- A second opinion on which project offers the best balance of profit potential and downside protection
Drop us a text for a non-obligatory Q&A.
Common Attribute #4 – Distance to MRT Is Critical for 2 Bedroom Capital Gain, but Not Mandatory for 3 Bedroom
Specific to investors looking to procure a profitable 2 bedroom new launch condo that appreciates the fastest, proximity to MRT is a critical factor of consideration.
From our analysis, distance from MRT tends to have a significant impact on both the speed and magnitude of capital appreciation generated by a new launch condo.
Looking at the top-ranked new launch condo developments – specifically at 2 bedroom unit performance – 6 out of 8 developments are located right next to MRT stations. Whereas the underperforming 2 bedroom units are all located far from the MRT station.
This highlights the difference in underlying priority between 2 bedroom and 3 bedroom resale buyers:
- 2 bedroom resale buyers are mostly dual-income couples or singles without kids, and tend to prioritise convenience over space.
- 3 bedroom resale buyers are mostly families that drive, and are willing to compromise on distance to MRT for space.
2 Bedroom Outperformers Are Mostly Within Walking Distance from MRT
| Rank | Development | Tier | Median Profit (S$) | Distance to MRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jadescape | Top | S$340,150 | 0.25 km, 3–4 min, Marymount MRT |
| 2 | Parc Esta | Top | S$345,000 | 0.15 km, 2–3 min, Eunos MRT |
| 3 | Seaside Residences | Top | S$334,560 | 0.35–0.4 km, 4–6 min, Siglap MRT (upcoming) |
| 4 | Artra | Top | S$322,501 | 0.05–0.1 km, 1–2 min, Redhill MRT |
| 5 | Daintree Residence | Top | S$264,125 | 0.7–0.8 km, 9–11 min, Beauty World MRT |
| 6 | Stirling Residences | Top | S$275,000 | 0.5–0.6 km, 6–8 min, Queenstown MRT |
| 7 | Whistler Grand | Top | S$262,460 | 1.1–1.3 km, 13–16 min, Clementi MRT |
| 8 | Queens Peak | Mid | S$252,500 | 0.05–0.1 km, 1–2 min, Queenstown MRT |
2 Bedroom Underperformers Are Mostly Located Far Away from the MRT Station
| Rank | Development | Tier | Median Profit (S$) | Distance to MRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Parc Botannia | Bottom | S$178,320 | 0.25–0.35 km, 3–5 min, Thanggam LRT |
| 23 | The Jovell | Bottom | S$135,000 | 1.3–1.5 km, 15–18 min, Tampines East / Pasir Ris East MRT |
| 24 | Le Quest | Bottom | S$163,000 | 1.3–1.5 km, 15–18 min, Bukit Batok MRT |
| 25 | The Garden Residences | Bottom | S$145,900 | 0.8–0.9 km, 10–12 min, Serangoon North / Serangoon MRT |
| 26 | Jui Residences | Bottom | S$113,169 | 0.7–0.8 km, 9–11 min, Potong Pasir / Boon Keng MRT |
| 27 | Kandis Residence | Bottom | S$153,100 | 1.4–1.6 km, 16–20 min, Sembawang / Canberra MRT |
| 28 | Uptown Farrer | Bottom | S$73,307 | 0.1–0.2 km, 1–3 min, Farrer Park MRT |
More Top Performing New Launch Developments Amongst 3 Bedroom Units Are Not Proximate to MRT Station
| Rank | Development | Tier | Median Profit (S$) | Distance to MRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stirling Residences | Top | S$554,000 | 0.5–0.6 km, 6–8 min, Queenstown MRT |
| 2 | Parc Esta | Top | S$594,000 | 0.15 km, 2–3 min, Eunos MRT |
| 3 | Martin Modern | Top | S$651,920 | 0.6–0.7 km, 7–9 min, Great World MRT |
| 4 | Whistler Grand | Top | S$551,540 | 1.1–1.3 km, 13–16 min, Clementi MRT |
| 5 | Daintree Residence | Top | S$460,000 | 0.7–0.8 km, 9–11 min, Beauty World MRT |
| 6 | Artra | Top | S$604,950 | 0.05–0.1 km, 1–2 min, Redhill MRT |
| 7 | Jadescape | Top | S$538,700 | 0.25 km, 3–4 min, Marymount MRT |
| 8 | Park Colonial | Mid | S$507,000 | 0.15–0.2 km, 2–3 min, Woodleigh MRT |
| 9 | The Tre Ver | Mid | S$435,500 | 0.6–0.7 km, 7–9 min, Potong Pasir MRT |
| 10 | Seaside Residences | Mid | S$516,000 | 0.35–0.4 km, 4–6 min, Siglap MRT (upcoming) |
| 11 | Margaret Ville | Mid | S$409,308 | 0.8–0.9 km, 10–12 min, Queenstown MRT |
| 12 | Forest Woods | Mid | S$406,000 | 0.3–0.4 km, 4–6 min, Serangoon MRT |
| 13 | Amber 45 | Mid | S$454,500 | 0.5–0.6 km, 6–8 min, Marine Parade MRT (upcoming) |
Common Attribute #5 – Residential CCR Locations: Potentially the Next Wave of Growth
The truth is that there aren’t enough examples within this study to prove this point conclusively. But the fact that Martin Modern – a CCR development located in River Valley – is ranked as the 3rd most profitable new launch in terms of 3 bedroom performance is an indicator of a larger trend to come.
While there is an ongoing but fading narrative against the profitability of CCR condos, we believe this trend is about to be reversed.
On the ground, we see a positive transition in developer philosophy towards practicality and affordability for CCR developments – developing smaller, well-laid-out, affordable units targeting local homestay buyers. This transition is evident in developments like River Modern, River Green, and Skye at Holland.
Martin Modern’s profitability – particularly amongst the larger 3 and 4 bedroom unit types – is an early indicator of the next wave of new launch profitability beginning in CCR locations with residential characteristics.
A point to note, however, is that a longer holding duration is to be expected for CCR property as compared to RCR and OCR properties. From our study, a minimum 6-year holding horizon should be expected, instead of the 4.5 to 5-year median for RCR and OCR properties.
Martin Modern Is Highly Profitable for Larger Bedroom Types Despite Premium Price Tag
| Unit Type | Average Size (sqft) | Average Profit (S$) | Average Holding Duration (Years) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Bedroom | 831 | S$230,126 | 6.0 |
| 3 Bedroom | 1,205 | S$585,378 | 5.7 |
| 4 Bedroom | 1,440 | S$548,267 | 5.2 |
Common Attribute #6 – Million Dollar HDB Exit Effect
Based on the 32 new launches studied, amongst the top performers there is a concentration in location towards areas like Queenstown, Clementi, Redhill, and Marine Parade.
The common attribute amongst these locations is that they are estates with a high concentration of million dollar HDB flat exits.
Putting ourselves in the shoes of these million dollar HDB flat sellers, the natural inclination is to upgrade into a condo with the same centrality – or to upgrade to a condo in the same centralised location. Hence, the HDB wealth effect is retained within these neighbourhoods, fuelling both the magnitude and speed of appreciation for new launch developments in these areas.
New Launch Developments Benefiting from the Million Dollar HDB Exit Effect
| Rank | Development | Tier | Median Profit (S$) | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stirling Residences | Top | S$554,000 | Queenstown |
| 6 | Artra | Top | S$604,950 | Redhill |
| 11 | Margaret Ville | Mid | S$409,308 | Queenstown |
| 16 | Queens Peak | Mid | S$346,890 | Queenstown |
| 4 | Whistler Grand | Top | S$551,540 | Clementi |
| 13 | Amber 45 | Mid | S$454,500 | Marine Parade |
HDB Estates with Count of Million Dollar HDB Exits
| Estate | Region | Approx. Million-$ HDB Count | Evidence / Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Queenstown | RCR | 200+ (≈276) | Among top estates; strong Dawson/Henderson/Dover cluster. |
| Clementi | RCR | 100+ (≈123) | Multiple records at Clementi Towers/Crest, central-west hub. |
| Toa Payoh | RCR | 200+ (≈271 by 2025) | Leads Singapore by volume of million-$ flats. |
| Bishan | RCR | 100+ | Major hotspot; repeated S$1.5–1.6M+ deals. |
| Marine Parade | RCR | ~13 | First million-$ deal in 2022; about 13 by 2024. |
| Serangoon | OCR | ~15–20 | Some exec/5-room million-$ deals, but far less than RCR leaders. |
| Yishun | OCR | A handful (≤10) | Only a few million-$ transactions so far. |
| Woodlands | OCR | A handful (≤10) | Just started seeing million-$ flats in recent years. |
| Bukit Panjang | OCR | 1+ | Entered million-$ club in 2023. |
| Sengkang | OCR | 1+ | First million-$ flat in 2024. |
| Punggol | OCR | A few (≈3–5 so far) | First around S$1.2M in 2022; more since, including ~S$1.47M record. |
| Bedok | OCR | ~7–10 | First jumbo at ~S$1.05M in 2022, followed by several million-$ executive and DBSS/5-room deals. |
| Sembawang | OCR | 0 (as of 2024) | Still no million-$ HDB; top around mid-900Ks. |
Appendix
Qualitative Attribute Matrix of New Launch Condos that Appreciate the Most in the Shortest Period of Time
| Development ⇅ | Category ⇅ | District ⇅ | Region ⇅ | Units ⇅ | MRT Walk ⇅ | Top School within 1km | HDB Upgrader Demand ⇅ | Supply Scarcity ⇅ | Developer Tier ⇅ | Size Tier ⇅ | Launch PSF ⇅ | Future Growth Catalyst | Key Notes |
|---|
Looking to Purchase a New Launch Condo as a Second Property?
Check out the following articles for more insights on how to minimise ABSD:
- Decoupling Property Singapore – The Complete Guide
- How to Buy a Second Property in Singapore Without ABSD?
- Full Cost of Purchasing a Second Property in 2026?