Introduction
The fact that you landed on this article makes it safe to assume that you are interested in investing in Faber Residence.
On a cautionary note, Faber Residence is unique in the sense that it does not possess all the common attributes you would typically expect from a new launch condo.
It is neither a mega-scale project nor is it located near an MRT station. Instead, it is a low-rise, low-density development situated within a landed housing enclave further out from Clementi.
Because of these differences, it is important to understand their implications clearly and assess whether Faber Residence can be an optimal investment for you.
We Are Decoupling Expertise
Quick introduction, before you decide to commit the next 5 mins reading this article.
We are decoupling expertise, a team of specialist realtors that specialise in helping Singapore property owners derive the best strategy to purchase their second investment property in the most tax efficient manner.
Aside from decoupling property, we specialise in property research. Helping client that values owning high capital return property, shortlist and identify worthy condo developments to look into
Drop us a text if you like to shortlist prospective properties or confirm your thoughts on a current property
Basic Project Information
To get everyone on the same page, here are some quick facts about Faber Residence.
It is a small to mid-sized development with 399 units, built on a relatively large plot of land measuring 277,659 square feet. Unlike the typical high-rise condo, Faber Residence will take on a low-rise, resort-style design – offering a different living environment from the usual dense urban projects.
| Attribute | Details |
| Development Name | Faber Residence |
| Developer | GuocoLand, TID Residential Pte. Ltd., and Intrepid Investments Pte. Ltd. |
| Location | Faber Walk, Clementi, District 5 |
| District | District 5 (D05) |
| Site Area | 25,795.4 sqm (~277,659 sq ft) |
| No. of Units | 399 residential units |
| No. of Blocks | Nine low-rise blocks, each five storeys |
| Tenure | 99-year leasehold |
| Expected TOP | 2029 |
Location Analysis
To start off, let’s orientate ourselves to where Faber Residence is located. Clementi can broadly be broken down into four sub-zones:
- Cluster 1 – Condos nearest to Clementi MRT, such as The Trilinq and Parc Clematis.
- Cluster 2 – Still within walking distance to the MRT, including projects like Clavon, The Clement Canopy and Elta.
- Cluster 3 – Developments more than 1km from Clementi MRT, where residents typically rely on buses to get to the station. Examples include Whistler Grand, Twin View and Parc Riviera.
- Cluster 4 – This is where Faber Residence sits. Equally far out as Twin View and Whistler Grand, but uniquely located in a low-rise landed enclave near Jurong East. This area has the fewest private condos and remains relatively “untainted” by high-rise developments.
With this mental map in place, we can now look at the key strengths and weaknesses of Faber Residence’s location.
Weaknesses
- Not within walking distance of an MRT station
- Limited amenities in the immediate area
Strengths
- Within 1km of Nan Hua Primary School, one of the most sought-after schools in Singapore
- Nestled in a landed enclave, providing privacy and a peaceful living environment
- Units above level 3 enjoy unblocked views, given the surrounding landed properties are capped at three storeys
Plot Density
Another strength and clear differentiator for Faber Residence is its low density. With fewer units spread across a relatively large site, the development is designed to provide more open communal spaces and potentially more extensive facilities. This sets it apart from the denser, high-rise condo experience.
In terms of character, Faber Residence bears resemblance to The Calrose, a resale condo in Lentor that is also known for its low-rise, resort-style environment.
On a site area per unit basis, Faber Residence stands out strongly when compared to nearby developments:
| Development | Site Area (sqft) | No. of Units | Site Area per Unit (sqft/unit) |
| Faber Residence | 277,659 | 399 | 696 |
| Parc Riviera | 203,532 | 762 | 267 |
| Twin View | 176,296 | 520 | 339 |
| Whistler Grand | 210,883 | 716 | 295 |
| Parc Clematis | 633,664 | 1,468 | 432 |
Bid Price Analysis
When it comes to assessing land bid prices, there are three key factors to consider:
- Number of bids – More bids suggest developers see potential in the site, which is a positive sign.
- Land cost vs market average – Securing the land below market average gives developers more pricing flexibility.
- Bid premium – A lower premium means the developer did not overpay and is less likely to pass inflated costs to buyers.
For Faber Residence, all three conditions are met. There were three competitive bids for the site, with GuocoLand ultimately securing it at a relatively low land price of $900 psf ppr, at just a 9% premium.
Notably, this cost is substantially lower than Elta – a recent Clementi launch located in a more central part of the district – and even lower than Springleaf Residence, which sits in a less central location.
This low land cost gives GuocoLand significant leeway to price Faber Residence competitively, a factor we will examine more closely in the next section on projected launch pricing.
| Project | Land Bid Price | Land Breakeven (S$/psf ppr) |
| Lentor Central | 982 | 1,793 |
| Springleaf Residence | 905 | 1,800 |
| ELTA | 1250 | 2,156 |
| Faber Residence | 900 | 1,682 |
Launch Price Estimate
At this stage, the official launch price for Faber Residence has not been released. To establish a reasonable projection, we can work backwards from the land breakeven cost and apply an estimated developer profit margin.
Land Breakeven Cost
With GuocoLand securing the site at $900 psf ppr, the breakeven cost – after factoring in construction, financing, and marketing – comes to approximately $1,682 psf ppr. This forms the baseline cost for the developer.
Developer’s Estimated Margin
Looking at GuocoLand’s past projects and referencing Elta, a recent Clementi launch, the developer’s typical markup falls around 25%. Applying this margin to the breakeven cost, the projected launch price for Faber Residence is expected to be in the range of $2,100 to $2,200 psf.
| Project | Land Breakeven (S$/psf ppr) | Average Launch Price (S$/psf) | Approximate Mark-Up (%) |
| Lentor Central | 1,793 | 2,219 | 24% |
| Springleaf Residence | 1,800 | 2,176 | 21% |
| ELTA | 2,156 | 2,543 | 18% |
| Faber Residence | 1,682 | 2,103 | 25% |
Looking to invest in a new launch ?
Deploying your capital into an optimal new launch project is crucial at this point.
It helps to have a detailed comparison of all the pros and cons across all new launch opportunities available.
Drop as a whatsapp text and we will revert with a 5 factor comparison table of the best new launch opportunities available at the moment.
Price Benchmark
Since unit sizes for Faber Residence have not yet been released, we use Lentor Central as a reasonable proxy. Developed by the same developer, GuocoLand, Lentor Central’s unit sizes and layouts were well received in the market. It is therefore reasonable to assume that a similar configuration will be applied to Faber Residence.
Based on these estimated sizes and the projected launch prices established earlier, we can build a pricing matrix for Faber Residence, covering different purchase quantums across unit types.
Comparison with Resale Condos
To set a lower bound for pricing, it is useful to look at comparable resale developments in Clementi – namely Whistler Grand, Twin View, and Parc Riviera.
The goal for Faber Residence is to keep the price gap with these resales as narrow as possible. Using 3-bedroom units as the benchmark, if Faber Residence were to launch around $2,200 psf, it would remain competitive. Whistler Grand is currently trading at about $1,976 psf, trending towards $2,000 psf, while Twin View is trading around $1,800 psf.
From a quantum perspective, if Faber Residence’s 3-bedroom units launch in the $1.9M to $2.0M range, they would sit in a sweet spot – priced very close to their resale counterparts, yet with the advantage of a fresh 99-year lease.
Faber Residence Estimated Purchase Quantum Matrix
| Unit Type | Unit Size | Estimated PSF – $2,100 | Estimated PSF – $2,200 | Estimated PSF – $2,300 |
| 2 Bedroom | 678 | 1,423,800 | 1,491,600 | 1,559,400 |
| 3 Bedroom | 915 | 1,921,500 | 2,013,000 | 2,104,500 |
| 4 Bedroom | 1,184 | 2,486,400 | 2,604,800 | 2,723,200 |
| 5 Bedroom | 1,453 | 3,051,300 | 3,196,600 | 3,341,900 |
Twin View
| Bedrooms | Average Size (sqft) | Average Price (psf) | Average Quantum ($) |
| 1 | 541 | 1,798 | 974,815 |
| 2 | 750 | 1,760 | 1,320,111 |
| 3 | 1,055 | 1,848 | 1,947,801 |
| 4 | 1,398 | 1,851 | 2,582,250 |
Whistler Grand
| Bedrooms | Average Size (sqft) | Average Price (psf) | Average Quantum ($) |
| 1 | 469 | 1,862 | 871,400 |
| 2 | 648 | 1,900 | 1,229,676 |
| 3 | 1,009 | 1,976 | 1,994,286 |
| 4 | 1,276 | 1,897 | 2,420,000 |
Parc Riviera
| Bedrooms | Average Size (sqft) | Average Price (psf) | Average Quantum ($) |
| 1 | 463 | 1,725 | 798,429 |
| 2 | 665 | 1,659 | 1,096,389 |
| 3 | 993 | 1,633 | 1,600,238 |
| 4 | 1,270 | 1,685 | 2,111,600 |
Comparison with New Launch Condo
Comparable new launches serve as the upper bound pricing benchmark for Faber Residence. Ideally, Faber Residence should be priced meaningfully below these projects to present clear value to buyers.
If Faber Residence launches in the $2,100 to $2,200 psf range, the competitiveness becomes apparent. Elta, also located in Clementi, is being launched at $2,500 to $2,600 psf, while the less central Springleaf Residence is priced around $2,100 psf. Lyndenwood, another reference point, is positioned even higher at $2,400 psf.
Assuming Faber Residence adopts efficient layouts similar to GuocoLand’s other projects, a 3-bedroom unit priced around $2.0M would offer a compelling purchase quantum. This affordability would stand out sharply against higher-priced competitors like Elta and Lyndenwood, reinforcing Faber Residence’s value proposition.
Faber Residence Estimated Purchase Quantum Matrix
| Unit Type | Unit Size | Estimated PSF – $2,100 | Estimated PSF – $2,200 | Estimated PSF – $2,300 |
| 2 Bedroom | 678 | 1,423,800 | 1,491,600 | 1,559,400 |
| 3 Bedroom | 915 | 1,921,500 | 2,013,000 | 2,104,500 |
| 4 Bedroom | 1,184 | 2,486,400 | 2,604,800 | 2,723,200 |
| 5 Bedroom | 1,453 | 3,051,300 | 3,196,600 | 3,341,900 |
Elta
| Bedrooms | Average Size (sqft) | Average Price (psf) | Average Quantum ($) |
| 1 | 506 | 2,520 | 1,274,833 |
| 2 | 684 | 2,561 | 1,751,542 |
| 3 | 948 | 2,605 | 2,469,520 |
| 4 | 1,273 | 2,436 | 3,098,450 |
| 5 | 1,776 | 2,221 | 3,944,333 |
Springleaf Residence
| Bedrooms | Average Size (sqft) | Average Price (psf) | Average Quantum ($) |
| 1 | 388 | 2,310 | 895,100 |
| 2 | 603 | 2,176 | 1,312,300 |
| 3 | 894 | 2,176 | 1,943,043 |
| 4 | 1,227 | 2,163 | 2,654,294 |
| 5 | 1,460 | 2,198 | 3,209,571 |
Lyndenwood
| Bedrooms | Average Size (sqft) | Average Price (psf) | Average Quantum ($) |
| 2 | 790 | 2,494 | 1,971,875 |
| 3 | 1,185 | 2,430 | 2,876,919 |
| 4 | 1,647 | 2,357 | 3,881,143 |
URA Transformation
Faber Residence, located near Jurong East, stands to benefit from the wider Jurong Lake District transformation. Much like the Greater Southern Waterfront, this is a major urban renewal project with new transport and commercial infrastructure set to reshape the area.
Jurong Regional Line
As part of the transformation, the Jurong Regional Line (JRL) is under development. The upcoming Pandan Reservoir MRT station, located about 1km from Faber Residence, is scheduled for completion between 2028 and 2029. This will enhance connectivity for residents who currently rely on bus services to access MRT lines.
Jurong Lake District
The growth of the Jurong Lake District is expected to bring increased rental demand, particularly from white-collar professionals working in the expanding business hub. Over time, the uplift in property values within Jurong is also likely to spill over into surrounding areas – positioning Faber Residence to benefit from this broader transformation.
Supply and Demand Analysis
To assess the market balance, we look at the demand and supply dynamics for different unit types in comparable Clementi developments that are located further from the MRT.
Overall, supply and demand appears healthy across all unit types, with no clear signs of oversupply. Even for smaller formats such as 2-bedroom units, the number of listings remains in line with historical sales volume.
A key point to note is the potential undersupply of 3-bedroom units. Demand for well-sized and affordable 3-bedders is strong, yet the pool of available listings remains limited. This suggests that 3-bedroom units at Faber Residence could see healthy take-up and future resale interest.
For 4-bedroom units, the data shows more listings available relative to transaction volume so far in 2025. However, based on on-ground experience, there is still solid demand for larger and reasonably priced 4-bedroom homes in Clementi. The higher quantum may simply mean buyers in this segment take longer to commit.
2 Bedroom – Demand and Supply
| Development | Bedroom Type | Sales Volume (2025) | No of Listing | Listing to Sales Ratio |
| Twin View | 2 | 17 | 16 | 0.9 |
| Whistler Grand | 2 | 26 | 19 | 0.7 |
| Parc Riviera | 2 | 18 | 13 | 0.7 |
| Average | 20 | 16 | 0.8 |
3 Bedroom – Demand and Supply
| Development | Bedroom Type | Sales Volume (2025) | No of Listing | Listing to Sales Ratio |
| Twin View | 3 | 18 | 8 | 0.4 |
| Whistler Grand | 3 | 7 | 10 | 1.4 |
| Parc Riviera | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0.4 |
| Average | 11 | 7 | 0.7 |
4 Bedroom – Demand and Supply
| Development | Bedroom Type | Sales Volume (2025) | No of Listing | Listing to Sales Ratio |
| Twin View | 4 | 8 | 7 | 0.9 |
| Whistler Grand | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1.0 |
| Parc Riviera | 4 | 5 | 13 | 2.6 |
| Average | 5 | 7 | 1.5 |
Unit Type Selection
Profitability Trends Across Unit Types
Using Whistler Grand, Twin View, and Parc Riviera as proxies, the data shows that larger 3- and 4-bedroom units have consistently delivered the strongest gains.
- Whistler Grand: 3-bedroom units achieved 7.4% annualised gain; 4-bedroom units achieved 7.1%.
- Twin View: 3-bedroom units achieved 4.9%; 4-bedroom units achieved 5.7%.
Why 3-Bedroom Units Stand Out
The insights point clearly to 3-bedroom units as the optimal choice. They balance capital appreciation with scarcity in supply, making them well positioned for both investors and homestay buyers.
Considerations for 4-Bedroom Units
4-bedroom units have also shown strong performance. However, their higher purchase quantum tends to slow sales velocity. Buyers should be prepared for a longer holding period when considering this segment.
Where 2-Bedroom Units Fit In
Surprisingly, 2-bedroom units have also performed reasonably well, even without MRT proximity. That said, in a low-rise, landed-enclave development like Faber Residence, the appeal is likely to skew towards family buyers rather than investors. For those set on a 2-bedder, projects like Penrith or Zyon Grand may present more suitable options.
Whistler Grand
| Unit Type | Average Size | Average Profit | Average Annualised Capital Gain (%) |
| 1 | 467 | 123,504 | 4.2 |
| 2 | 677 | 260,214 | 5.5 |
| 3 | 1,011 | 508,352 | 7.4 |
| 4 | 1,286 | 626,387 | 7.1 |
Twin View
| Unit Type | Average Size | Average Profit | Average Annualised Capital Gain (%) |
| 1 | 527 | 147,099 | 3.3 |
| 2 | 747 | 205,078 | 3.7 |
| 3 | 1,072 | 353,835 | 4.9 |
| 4 | 1,389 | 511,727 | 5.7 |
Parc Riviera
| Unit Type | Average Size | Average Profit | Average Annualised Capital Gain (%) |
| 1 | 464 | 141,884 | 4.2 |
| 2 | 657 | 169,723 | 3.3 |
| 3 | 965 | 264,194 | 3.9 |
| 4 | 1,176 | 358,323 | 4.8 |
Rental Demand Analysis
From a rentability perspective, rental demand in Clementi is strong across the board, even for developments located further away from MRT stations.
Looking at the closest proxies – Faber Crest and Waterfront @ Faber, both situated right next to Faber Residence – rental yields have averaged around 3.5%, which is above the market norm.
That said, Faber Residence should not be viewed primarily as a rental play. While it offers respectable yields, the project is better suited for home stay buyers who also want their purchase to carry solid long-term investment potential, rather than for investors focused purely on rental income.
| Project Name | Distance from Clementi MRT | Rental Yield |
| THE TRILINQ | 548 | 3.7 |
| Parc Clematis | 614 | 3.4 |
| CLAVON | 640 | 3.6 |
| THE CLEMENT CANOPY | 1,005 | 3.5 |
| TWIN VEW | 1,371 | 3.7 |
| WHISTLER GRAND | 1,217 | 4 |
| Parc Riviera | 1,457 | 4.1 |
| FABER CREST | 1,251 | 3.5 |
| WATERFRONT @ FABER | 1,426 | 3.5 |
In-Market for Penrith and Skye at Holland as well ?
Check out our latest research publication that cross compare Penrith vs Skye at Holland, aim at addressing the dilemma most investors are facing this period, given there are multiple launches previewing at the same time.
Key Investment Case for Faber Residence
Competitive Pricing
Affordability is Faber Residence’s greatest strength, underpinned by its low land cost. This gives the developer flexibility to launch at a highly competitive price point. If priced within our earlier estimates, buyers will be securing a fresh 99-year lease at a quantum very close to resale projects like Whistler Grand, Twin View, and Parc Riviera.
Both Whistler Grand and Twin View were successful launches a few years ago, despite being far from Clementi MRT. They attracted buyers by positioning at lower entry prices compared to nearby projects like Clavon and Parc Clematis, which were closer to the MRT. Faber Residence is similarly positioned today – competitively priced against Parc Clematis and the newly launched Elta.
Strong Resale Condo Demand
Clementi, as a mature city fringe district, mirrors the dynamics of areas like Toa Payoh and Queenstown – where pent-up demand for condos remains consistently strong. Demand for larger resale units, especially 3- and 4-bedroom types, is evident in the robust annualised capital gains achieved by Parc Clematis, Clavon, and even further-out projects like Parc Riviera and Whistler Grand.
1km Radius to Nan Hua Primary School
Nan Hua Primary is consistently ranked among the top 10 schools in Singapore and is highly sought after by families. Faber Residence falls within its 1km radius – a strong draw for home stay buyers. By contrast, developments like Clavon and The Clement Canopy, despite achieving above-average capital gains of 5.4% and 4.7% respectively, are not within this radius. This proximity could give Faber Residence a distinct edge in the resale market.
Exclusive Landed Vibe
Faber Residence’s landed-enclave location offers a unique low-rise, private living environment. This exclusivity appeals strongly to buyers who prioritise privacy and tranquility. On the flip side, it may be less attractive to investors seeking mega-scale projects with easy MRT access and abundant amenities.
Positive Impact from URA Transformation
Finally, Faber Residence stands to benefit from ongoing URA transformation plans. The upcoming Jurong Regional Line, coupled with rising rental and resale demand from the Jurong Lake District, are long-term catalysts that could positively impact both demand and future capital appreciation.
Key Risks to Consider
While Faber Residence has several unique attributes that may make it a potential silent outperformer, it is important to steelman the investment case by also examining its risks.
Risk 1: Distance from MRT
One clear downside is that Faber Residence is not within walking distance of any MRT station. In today’s market, proximity to MRT has almost become a standard feature for new launches, with upcoming competitors such as Zyon Grand, Penrith, and Skye at Holland all enjoying walkable MRT access.
For Faber Residence, affordable pricing will be critical. Without a meaningful price advantage in psf and purchase quantum, its “far out” location may put it at a disadvantage. On the positive side, cluster 3 projects like Whistler Grand and Twin View still achieved capital appreciation above 3.5%, showing that affordability can outweigh MRT proximity for homestay buyers.
| Project Name | Tenure | Completion | No of units | Avg Price (S$ psf) | Annualised Capital Gain (%) |
| WHISTLER GRAND | 99 yrs FROM 2018 | 2022 | 716 | 1,887 | 5 |
| Parc Riviera | 99 yrs FROM 2015 | 2019 | 752 | 1,660 | 3.2 |
| TWIN VEW | 99 yrs FROM 2017 | 2021 | 520 | 1,822 | 3.6 |
Risk 2: Untested Landed Enclave Location
Although we have referenced Whistler Grand and Twin View as comparables, Faber Residence is located in a different sub-zone within Clementi – a private landed enclave that has fewer precedents. Its closest reference, Waterfront @ Faber, has underperformed with all unit types achieving less than 3% capital gains despite long holding periods.
That said, Waterfront @ Faber was a much smaller development of just 199 units and lacked the facilities and land efficiency of Faber Residence, which is spread over a significantly larger plot with more square footage per unit.
Waterfront @ Faber – Small Boutique Development
Waterfront @ Faber – Suboptimal Performance
| Unit Type | Average Size | Average Profit | Average Annualised Capital Gain (%) |
| 2 | 732 | 151,158 | 1.7 |
| 3 | 1,059 | 273,834 | 2.9 |
| 4 | 1,267 | 336,715 | 2.7 |
Whistler Grand and Twin View – Located in a High Rise Private Condo Enclave
Faber Residence – Located in an Untested Private Landed Enclave
Risk 3: Smaller Scale vs Mega Developments
Another consideration is scale. Many of the most successful new launches in recent years – Jadescape, Stirling Residences, Treasure at Tampines, Normanton Park, and Parc Clematis – are mega projects with 800 to 1,000+ units, commanding strong transaction volumes and offering extensive facilities.
By contrast, Faber Residence is a mid-sized project with 399 units. The question is whether it will lack the same momentum and facilities that buyers expect from larger launches. On the upside, its lower density could work in its favour, offering more privacy and space per unit compared to its denser counterparts.
| Development | Site Area (sqft) | No. of Units | Site Area per Unit (sqft/unit) |
| Faber Residence | 277,659 | 399 | 696 |
| Parc Riviera | 203,532 | 762 | 267 |
| Twin View | 176,296 | 520 | 339 |
| Whistler Grand | 210,883 | 716 | 295 |
| Parc Clematis | 633,664 | 1,468 | 432 |
Conclusion – Will We Buy?
Getting straight to the point – yes, we would consider buying a unit in Faber Residence, but only under specific conditions. The purchase would need to serve both home stay and investment purposes, with a holding period of at least 6 to 7 years. This timeframe allows catalysts like the Jurong Regional Line and Jurong Lake District transformation to materialise and support future capital appreciation.
A key condition is competitive pricing. Entry into this development only makes sense if the launch price is meaningfully attractive compared to surrounding resale and new launch options. Within the project, our preference would be for a 3-bedroom unit, which offers the best balance of capital gain potential and demand resilience.
For 2-bedroom units, we would look elsewhere. Projects like Penrith may be better suited for investors or couples without children who form the future buyer pool for smaller units. Faber Residence, by contrast, is more aligned with family buyers drawn to exclusivity, space, and its proximity to Nan Hua Primary.
Need Clarity Before Committing to a New Launch Condo?
- Get independent, data-backed insights through our New Launch Condo Research Consultation:
- A tailored shortlist of new launch condos that match your search criteria
- Side-by-side pros and cons analysis of 2–3 projects you’re currently considering
- A second opinion on which project offers the best balance of profit potential and downside protection
Book your New Launch Research Consultation now to make a confident and well-informed decision.
More Read Regarding New Launch Condo Investing
- Thomson Reserve – Is this upcoming new launch worth investing in ?
- Full List of 2026 New Launch Condos to Look Out For in Singapore
- Latest List of Upcoming 2025 New Launch Condo – Worth looking out for ?
- Hougang Central New Condo Review
- The Sen New Launch Condo Review
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is the launch date for Faber Residence?
Faber Residence is expected to launch in Q4 2025, with an estimated TOP in 2029.
Where is Faber Residence located?
The development is at Faber Walk in Clementi (District 5), within a private landed enclave near Jurong East.
How many units are in Faber Residence?
Faber Residence will have 399 units spread across nine low-rise blocks, each five storeys high.
Is Faber Residence near an MRT station?
It is not within walking distance of an MRT. The nearest upcoming station is Pandan Reservoir on the Jurong Regional Line, about 1km away, slated for completion around 2028–2029.
Why is Faber Residence considered competitively priced?
The land was secured at a relatively low bid price of $900 psf ppr, giving the developer flexibility to launch at around $2,100 to $2,200 psf – close to resale comparables like Whistler Grand and Twin View.
Who is Faber Residence most suitable for?
The project is best suited for family home stay buyers who value privacy, exclusivity, and proximity to Nan Hua Primary School, while still seeking long-term investment potential.
What unit types will Faber Residence offer?
Exact sizes are not released yet, but it is expected to feature a mix of 2- to 5-bedroom layouts, with 3-bedroom units viewed as the most attractive balance of demand and capital appreciation.
